So, I've been playing more pump without the bar lately.
From tonight:
Mr. Larpus NM (no bar) - A
29 misses
Monkey Fingers NM (no bar) - A
41 misses
From a little while back:
Canon D Full CZ (no bar) - A
21 misses
Join The Party Another NM (no bar, no hands) - C
54 misses
Solitary 1.5 Crazy is a great chart!
Moderator: Moderators
- WhiteDragon
- Heavy
- Posts: 1312
- Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2005 3:04 am
- Location: North of Indy
- Contact:
- WhiteDragon
- Heavy
- Posts: 1312
- Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2005 3:04 am
- Location: North of Indy
- Contact:
I've decided to work my way through as many expert doubles as I can. I'm currently still moving along through the nines.
Someone had a high score of 93.16% on this, so I had to play it a few times to beat the score.
I like this chart
Someone had a high score of 93.16% on this, so I had to play it a few times to beat the score.
I like this chart
Original Sin wrote:Besides, this is IndyDDR...honestly. What do you expect?
- WhiteDragon
- Heavy
- Posts: 1312
- Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2005 3:04 am
- Location: North of Indy
- Contact:
- WhiteDragon
- Heavy
- Posts: 1312
- Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2005 3:04 am
- Location: North of Indy
- Contact:
- WhiteDragon
- Heavy
- Posts: 1312
- Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2005 3:04 am
- Location: North of Indy
- Contact:
Re: Solitary 1.5 Crazy is a great chart!
Solitary 1.5 CZ - A
10 bads
2 misses
10 bads
2 misses
Original Sin wrote:Besides, this is IndyDDR...honestly. What do you expect?
Re: Solitary 1.5 Crazy is a great chart!
Awesome score
The step chart is still bad, though
The step chart is still bad, though
Yea, I'm like Mother Teresa, except I pwn.
- WhiteDragon
- Heavy
- Posts: 1312
- Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2005 3:04 am
- Location: North of Indy
- Contact:
Re: Solitary 1.5 Crazy is a great chart!
I do tend to disagree whole heartedly, good Sir!FLAKK wrote:The step chart is still bad, though
Original Sin wrote:Besides, this is IndyDDR...honestly. What do you expect?
Re: Solitary 1.5 Crazy is a great chart!
SecondWhiteDragon wrote:I do tend to disagree whole heartedly, good Sir!FLAKK wrote:The step chart is still bad, though