Page 21 of 21
Re: ummmmm Diablo III anyone???
Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2014 2:32 pm
by Merk
I will show it to you tonight.
I want to make a lady Crusader and call her "Jane Darr"
Re: ummmmm Diablo III anyone???
Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2014 4:10 pm
by Fluffyumpkins
Merk wrote:I will show it to you tonight.
I want to make a lady Crusader and call her "Jane Darr"
I laughed.
Re: ummmmm Diablo III anyone???
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2014 12:46 pm
by Fluffyumpkins
Fluffyumpkins wrote:I bet that everyone hating on D3 still gives up that cash as soon as Blizzard drops the bass.
Called it back in August.
Re: ummmmm Diablo III anyone???
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2014 1:17 pm
by Riot
Fluffyumpkins wrote:Fluffyumpkins wrote:I bet that everyone hating on D3 still gives up that cash as soon as Blizzard drops the bass.
Called it back in August.
People hating on it because of its problems...
Blizzard fixes problems....
People give up cash, enjoy the game they wanted?
Re: ummmmm Diablo III anyone???
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2014 3:49 pm
by Fluffyumpkins
*the game they expected the first time.
You shouldn't be content with buying a bad game just so you can buy a tested/fixed version of the game later. How much does Diablo cost to play?
33.80 for core game on Amazon.
39.99 for Reaper of Souls.
Re: ummmmm Diablo III anyone???
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2014 7:34 am
by Merk
Yeah it's pretty dumb but that's sort of par for the course for big name vidja games now:
* Call of Duty has to release a game every year
* Metal Gear Solid has you pay $20 for a demo
* Blizzard will sell you a polished half of a game and then sell you the second half years later. They have more or less always done this except this time I'd say that expectations for D3 Vanilla were a little higher and their execution was way the fuck lower but they made a conscious effort to turn themselves around (remove Jay Wilson, shut down auction house, Loot 2.0) which is more than what any other company would do so I'd give them a pass.