BigBadOrc wrote:I was attempting to understand your post, I wasn't saying that you said that, I was just asking you if that's what you meant because I did not understand what you meant when you made a distinction between the "THEORY of evolution" and the "science as we know it". You brought up creationism, I was trying to understand why.hascoolnickname wrote:I don't believe I am advocating it as one in my post, please show me where I did so
So I guess I still don't see how your post addresses Paul's statement:hascoolnickname wrote:I'm sorry you're right when Dr. Paul said it's fine and that there's nothing to have an absolute answer on whether it's true or not he obviously meant that it doesn't exist and he doesn't believe in it at all. Keep in mind we're talking about the THEORY of evolution here, not evolution as a science as we know it, but the THEORY of evolution that has to be mutually exclusive to creationism and every other idea out there, unlike evolution as the mechanism for change of trait inheritance in a population.
And giving me a wiki and telling me to read it doesn't count as making a coherent argumentRon Paul wrote:"it's a theory and i don't accept it."
this is why we can't have nice things
bak2grkn